These Scientists Were Fed Up with Climate Change Deniers. Here’s What They Did About It.

Reddit’s popular /r/science forum has banned posts and comments from people who deny that human-caused climate change is real. First announced on Grist, the controversial move has drawn charges of censorship. “Since when is science so concrete that differing opinions are not allowed?” one commenter complained. But as moderator Nathan Allan explained,  the forum is only for discussing “recent, peer-reviewed scientific publications.” With the need for more productive, reality- and solutions-based conversations about climate science, this might just be the beginning of a trend.
Source: Think Progress

Kelp: The Sea Weed That Could Save Mankind

Bren Smith blends into the New England seascape, a waterman decked out in waders tooling around on his boat in the Long Island Sound. On this hazy July morning, he’s motored out aboard the Mookie III from a Stony Creek, Conn., dock to check on his oyster beds scattered between the Thimble Islands. Another boat putters by, and Smith raises his arm to point, his hands cloaked in rubber gloves to protect against the barnacles. “That guy,” Smith says, “is only catching about five pounds of lobsters a day. He doesn’t even pay for half his fuel with that.” And with this observation, Smith shatters the illusion that he’s just another fisherman chasing his catch.
Smith, in fact, is a genuine revolutionary, a man who sees powerful currents of change in the choppy waters off the Atlantic seaboard. And his neighbor, chugging past with his nearly empty hold, is proof that the end of a way of life is looming—and the beginning of a new one is at hand.
Climate change has affected the fishing beds. Ocean acidification, a product of rising atmospheric CO2 levels, kills off coral reefs, causes toxic algae blooms and dissolves the shells of oysters and other mollusks, researchers say.
And then there’s what Smith calls the “rape and pillage” of the world’s oceans—the overfishing that has dried up once-fertile sources of food, and sent unemployment in once-thriving seaside communities through the roof. Smith assigns himself a share of the blame. He fished for McDonald’s in the Bering Sea some years back, and pushed the cod stocks to the brink. But grousing about it, and hoping government regulation will solve the problem, won’t do the trick. What fishermen catch needs to be rethought. What fishermen should be doing, in Smith’s view, is harvesting kelp.
Yes, you read that right: the slimy brown sea vegetation that has grossed out generations of New England beachgoers. You might think of it as an annoyance of no particular significance to mankind. Smith sees it as a jobs program, an amazing source of nutrition, a strategic adaptation to the havoc being wrought by global warming—and, quite possibly, the next big thing in trendy New York City restaurants.
He calls it his “path of ecological redemption,” and he’s calling on fishermen, businessmen and consumers to follow it with him.
Continue reading “Kelp: The Sea Weed That Could Save Mankind”

The Military Is Devoted to Something That Will Totally Shock You

The U.S. Military is deeply committed to developing renewable energy technologies and minimizing climate change impacts. Does that surprise you? The reason is that the military’s top leaders see climate change impacts and energy availability as keys to keeping our soldiers, our citizens and the people of the world safe. For instance, every gallon of fuel that can be replaced by solar power or high-storage batteries is one less gallon of fuel that has to be bought and transported. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel reaffirmed this commitment recently at a security conference. Here’s why that’s cool. Remember how the Internet originally started out as a military project? In the same way, it’s a sure bet that the renewable energy innovations that come out of the military’s sustainability programs will inform our lives, too.
 

Would Your State Survive a Climate Change Catastrophe?

Depending on where you live, climate change impacts look different. Some places are dealing with drought and excessive heat, others have sea level rise or unprecedented storm activity. (It’s important to remember that climate change doesn’t directly cause wild, weird weather. It just contributes to its likelihood and severity.) These differences are why all 50 states need to have a climate change plan that’s right for its citizens, industries and location. How does your state stack up? Take a look and see.
 

San Francisco’s Aggressive Plan Could Abolish Carbon Emissions

The Bay Area recently passed a climate protection resolution that will slash carbon emissions in the region 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. If successful, the policy could dramatically change the city’s transportation landscape. According to Quartz, “The Bay Area has California’s most extensive public transportation system and its tech-savvy drivers have been earlier adopters of electric cars… But [in order to make this work] the [air district board] will also need to convert more of the region’s bus and truck fleet to carbon-free fuels and electrify diesel-powered ports.” Beyond getting more people in battery-powered cars and electric buses, the agency acts as an incubator for new technologies. “For instance, it’s helping to fund a pilot project to create an electric taxi service to link regional airports in San Francisco to the region’s cities,” according to Forbes. If these progressive measures to slash carbon emissions work in a car-centric city like San Francisco, the policy could serve as a model for the rest of the country.