4 Takeaways from the Summit on Working Families

During the Summit on Working Families on Monday, First Lady Michelle Obama recalled once bringing her youngest daughter to a job interview.
“Who I was at that time was a breastfeeding mother of a four-month-old, I didn’t have a babysitter, so I took Sasha to the interview with me,” she said. “And I thought, ‘Look, this is — this is who I am; I got a husband who’s away; I got two little babies, they are my priority. If you want me to do the job, you gotta pay me to do the job, and you’ve gotta give me flexibility.”
Echoing the struggle many Americans face in striking a balance between work and home life, the First Lady  joined her husband President Barack Obama, the White House, the Department of Labor, and the Center for American Progress in hosting a day-long discussion directed at creating better workplace policies for parents.
Business leaders (including CEOs from Johnson & Johnson and Goldman Sachs), lawmakers, working families, and White House officials participated in the all-day summit, as well as Vice President Joe Biden and Dr. Jill Biden.
At Monday afternoon’s remarks, Obama announced a presidential memorandum requiring federal agencies to provide employees more flexibility to take time off to take care of ill family members, to nurse, or to be able to work from home without suffering repercussions. Though the president did not offer up a plan requiring paid leave, he outlined four major themes that could help create a better life for American workers.
Flexible workplaces
The White House argues that more flexible schedules lead to happier employees, boosts productivity, and reduces turnaround rates, as Bloomberg Businessweek points out.  As a part of the president’s executive order, federal agencies are required to review their policies on flexibilities as a part of the Office of Personnel Management’s plan to create a Workplace Flexibility Index, which will be updated annually to measure success, according to a White House fact sheet.
Obama also urged lawmakers to pass the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, which would require employers to accommodate pregnant women with flexibility that would allow them to keep their jobs.
Mad Men actress Christina Hendricks also spoke, illustrating the point that U.S. workplace policies were outdated. Using her character on the AMC series, a single mom and professional, Hendricks said, “In the 21st century the only place for a story like Joan’s should be on TV.”

Paid family leave 

Obama also pointed out that the U.S. is the only developed country without mandated paid maternity leave. Women now comprise half the American workforce while men are increasingly playing the role of caregivers more than ever before.
“Many women can’t even get a paid day off to give birth,” Obama said. “That’s a pretty low bar.”

Obama also urged Congress to pass the FAMILY Act, which would annually provide up to 12 weeks of paid leave to qualifying workers for personal illness, to take care of a sick family member, or for the birth or adoption of a child. While current federal policy allows up to three months of unpaid leave for newborns or sick family members for some employees, the law only covers about 60 percent of the American labor force—leaving almost half of all workers without the ability take leave sans a paycheck, the president argues.

Child Care

Child care was also mentioned at the summit. As a part of his initiative for better work policies, Obama will ask Labor Secretary Thomas Perez to set aside $25 million towards childcare for employees who want to attend job-training programs. Today, more than 60 percent of families with children live in a dual-income household, compared to only 40 percent of households with two working parents in 1965, according to U.S Council of Economic Advisors report.

“One study shows that nearly half of all parents, women and men, report that they’ve said no to a job, not because they didn’t want it, but because it would be too hard on their families,” Obama said. “When that many talented, hard-working people are forced to choose between work and family, something’s wrong. Other countries are making it easier for people to have both. We should too, if we want American businesses to compete and win in the global economy.”

Equal pay and raising the minimum wage

The president also emphasized pay equality and increasing the minimum wage as part of setting a 21st century workplace agenda. While females are more likely to work in low-wage and minimum-wage jobs than men, more than 40 percent of mothers are their family’s primary breadwinner yet they earn just 77 cents to every dollar, on average, compared to their male counterparts, according to White House economic advisers.

The President argued that by limiting the female labor force the U.S. is hindering its global edge. The U.S. ranks 17th in female labor participation among the world’s richest countries, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research. Back in 1990, the U.S. placed sixth.

These four narratives underscored a greater message from the White House: supporting families through better workplace policies is not just a women’s issue.
“At a time when women are nearly half of our workforce,” Obama said, “anything that makes life harder for women, makes life harder for families, and makes life harder for children. There’s no such thing as a women’s issue; this is a family issue. This is an American issue.”

D.C., New York City and Boston Named Tops for Foot Traffic

Go on, step outside and take a stroll not through the woods, but through an urban area instead.
LOCUS, a national group of real estate developers and investors who work towards creating more sustainable and walker-friendly urban areas, just released a report, Foot Traffic Ahead: Ranking Walkable Urbanism in America’s Largest Metros,  on the most walkable urban areas in America.
Topping the list? Washington D.C., New York City and Boston.
LOCUS, which works in partnership with Smart Growth America (a non-profit that focuses on developing and sustaining great urban neighborhoods), held its LOCUS Leadership Summit on June 17-18 in Washington D.C. The gathering was a forum for real estate developers, investors, members of Congress and others to brainstorm ideas on design, planning, finance, and management.
The highlight of the event, however, was the release of the rankings of the 30 largest metropolitan areas with the most walkable urban areas. The study was conducted by the Responsible Real Estate Developers and Investors in coordination with George Washington University’s Center for Real Estate and Urban Analysis. This year’s rankings updated those from a 2007 report from the Brookings Institution’s Metropolitan Policy Program.
The study used office and retail space and walkability within the seven categories of the metro area — downtown, downtown adjacent, urban commercial, urban university suburban town center, redeveloped drivable suburban and green or brown field — to determine the rankings.
Phoenix and Orlando fell to the bottom of the list. However, there is hope for them to improve as the study not just looked at each city’s walkability today, but also predicted their future foot-friendliness. In that set of rankings, Boston moved to the number-one spot, and Orlando jumped to number 18.
Further findings suggest a strong correlation between education and walkability as the higher education levels were also found in the top ranking cities. Top ranking cities also had 38 percent higher GDP per capita, and office rent in urban areas was 74 percent higher per square feet than drivable suburban offices.
So while urban areas face lots of difficulties, this report makes it sound like they have a lot going for them as well.
To view the full report, click here.
MORE: Infrastructure: America’s Investment for the Future

Utah Named the Most Business-Friendly State in the Union

How do you find the friendliest places to do business? Turns out, it’s not rocket science.
All you need to do is go to the businesses themselves, which is exactly what consumer service website Thumbtack.com did. Their study, conducted over two months and ending in late January, went direct to the source and asked 1,200 local small-business owners about their business environment.
And now, the results are in.
Taking the crown as the business-friendliest state is Utah, followed by Idaho, Texas, and Virginia all with “A+” ratings. At the opposite end are Rhode Island, Illinois, and California, most likely due to the high costs of operating in those states.
To compile the rankings, Thumbtack partnered with the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation on a survey that focused on these main categories: Starting a business, ease of hiring, overall regulations, and training/networking.
The survey also attempted to establish a correlation between government strategies and ease of business. Overall, the highest correlation was found between licensing and permitting regulations, as well as compliance with tax regulations.
Topping the list of business friendly metro areas is Colorado Springs, Colorado. (Sacramento, California came in last.) This ranking was determined by areas that had at least 30 survey responses.
Although there are positives and negative results of studies such as this, having access more data to improve the business environment is never a bad thing.
To check out the results click here or to view the full report, click here.
MORE: How Mobile Apps Help Local Governments Connect with Citizens

How Can Two Cities Develop the Area Between Them?

With all the reports of a lack of funding of infrastructure and transit projects nationwide, the Twin Cities have some good news to share.
Last Saturday, they celebrated the opening of a third light-rail line: the Green Line.
The nearly $1 billion transportation project is touted as more than just an engineering project to connect the vein that pulses from St. Paul to Minneapolis — it’s the city’s biggest foray into economic revitalization yet.
The Green Line initiative is the result of more than three decades of planning — returning the vacant lots and blighted 11-mile stretch between the two cities back into the bustling corridor it once was during the early part of last century. Known as the Central Corridor, the Green Line’s route will provide public transit from the state Capitol through the area of immigrant-owned, small businesses and to the University of Minnesota’s campus.
But the project is more than just a means of transportation. Both city mayors contend the goal is to develop the stretch between St. Paul and Minneapolis, attracting new residents and businesses, underscoring that improved infrastructure can lead to growing neighborhoods, the National Journal reports.
A variety of developers and contractors have already spent $2.5 billion in construction and redevelopment on 121 projects over the last five years within a half-mile of the Green Line, according to local planning agency the Metropolitan Council.
But community members are also pitching in with planning. The Central Corridor Funders Collaborative (CCFC), comprised of 12 local and national foundations, has spent $10 million on strategy, planning, and funding initiatives throughout the corridor. In fact, the CCFC, the St. Paul city government, and the Metropolitan Council have doled out more than $3.5 million in loans to more than 200 small businesses in the area.The CCFC is also working with developers to create affordable-housing and assist students with housing and internships along the route.
The CCFC projects the Central Corridor will require 70,000 new housing units and $7 billion in development in the next 30 years with the addition of the Green Line, CCFC director Jonathan Sage-Martinson says.
The key to revitalization is transit-oriented development, or creating self-sustainability through commercial and residential development that hinges on good public transit,  according to the MinnPost.

“The experience across the country is that creating successful transit-oriented development takes not just transit, but the real commitment to create successful places,” said Adam Harrington, director of Service Development at the Metropolitan Council. “With the Green Line, we are really living that out.”

Along with new development, the Green Line has given many communities a boost in marketing and debuting each as cultural destinations. Part of Saturday’s grand opening included different celebrations at each stop, put on by each community.

“Transit is fundamentally about connecting — connecting one neighborhood to another, one city to another, a working mom to quality child care, a college student to classes, baseball fans to the stadium, and employers to their employees, ” said Metropolitan Council Chair Susan Haigh. “Implementing a comprehensive transit vision makes us stronger, healthier and more connected metro region.”

MORE: Minnesota Looks to a Historic Structure to Help End Veteran Homelessness

The Washington PAC Fighting to Save Detroit

We all have a bit of pride when it comes to our hometown. But a group of Detroit natives are proving their allegiance runs beyond local sports teams and are using the power of politics to show their loyalty.
Two Washington, D.C. residents have launched Detroit XPAC, a political action committee funded by donations from the Motor City’s expatriates across the country. The goal is to tap the influence of Michigan’s professional youth that have left the state but still have a vested interest in rebuilding its fledging city.

“We are just a bunch of people from Michigan, from Detroit, who really love this city and want to see it doing well,” Farber said. “It can be amazing. And it’s getting there again.”

Registered at both state and federal levels, the PAC uses contributions to support candidates who have progressive ideas about rebuilding Detroit through economic and sustainable environmental policies, according to the National Journal.
Though the group is still small, it operates a national advisory board as well as a Capitol advisory board to assist with reaching lawmakers on the hill. Most of its members are volunteers who work in urban design or on environmental issues.
The PAC is currently focusing on four or five state, local and federal races, but hasn’t made any endorsements just yet. This year’s pilot run is a precursor to 2016, when the PAC hopes to use its influence for the larger election.
Farber is hoping to reshape the city that shaped her by helping decide who will lead Detroit out of decline. While some current residents may find outside influence on elections a bit disconcerting, Farber argues the PAC’s interest is genuine.

“Part of the reason we thought we should tap into the expats is because it’s a community that isn’t being focused on, and yet we’re all over the country,” she said. “We wanted to prove that the borders of Michigan don’t stop people’s love for the state or where they grew up.”

The group bills itself as nonpartisan but Farber confesses the group leans toward Democratic candidates, who tend to have more progressive ideas. For now, the PAC is readying questionnaires to send out to candidates to hear more about their ideas in the races it plans to endorse.

The PAC is also aiming to create similar advisor boards for New York City, San Francisco, Chicago, Denver, and Los Angeles.

“There are people on the wrong side of the aisle who think you can defund Detroit, you can cut off its resources, you can ignore it, you can pretend it doesn’t exist,” Dorsey said. “We believe that we must have people who are thinking through how to deliver for the economy in the best interests of citizens of Detroit and to protect the environment.”

Clearly, just because those citizens don’t live within Michigan state limits doesn’t mean they care any less about its long-term success.

MORE: Detroit’s Newest Parking Garage Becomes An Unlikely Canvas

The Competition for Disaster Relief Funds Heats Up

When you think of disaster relief, the words that probably come to mind are EMTs and paramedics, FEMA, and the Red Cross.
But for President Obama, it’s competition, resiliency, and natural disasters. These words — together — form his new plan to help with disaster relief.
While that may sound a bit odd, it encourages state and local governments to compete for natural disaster relief funds from the federal government. With $1 billion at stake, Obama challenged communities to create sustainable plans to rebuild and reboot their communities.
With the National Climate Assessment’s report released last month detailing the imminence of climate change, Obama’s plan also comes with the hope of finding ways to combat it. Therefore, competing states should come up with proposals that involve innovative local resilience projects, policy changes, and adaptive plans for extreme weather and climate change.
State and local communities that were declared natural disaster areas between 2011 and 2013 will be eligible for $820 million worth of grants. States hit by Hurricane Sandy will have the opportunity to compete for an additional $180 million. Applicants are required to detail how the proposed action and the disaster are linked.
Winners will receive cash through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Community Block Grant. Already, a few winners have been named for the Hurricane Sandy competition. Here, a few of the approved projects.
The Big U in New York will protect Manhattan (West 57th Street to The Battery to East 42nd Street) from floods and storm water through the creation of a protective system. This part of the city is low-lying and culturally important, and the project will have environmental and social benefits as well.
Another is the New Meadowlands: Productive City and Regional Park, which will combine transportation, ecology, and development to connect and rebuild the swampy area between New Jersey and New York.
The Jersey Shore will also receive some funding with a focus on repairing the beaches and rejuvenating the communities in the area.
For a listing and description of the rest of the approved projects, click here.
With all of the natural disasters that have occurred recently, President Obama’s competition will hopefully encourage states and local governments to plan and prepare to prevent such devastating effects from occurring in the future — or at least, lessen their impact.
MORE: A National Effort to Boost Local Resources
 

An App That Turns Everyday Bystanders Into Everyday Heroes

When an airplane passenger is in physical distress, the flight attendant calls through the speakers asking if medical professionals are on board. It’s a simple action that can make a huge difference. What if we could mimic this same outreach, 10,000 feet below, everyday on the ground?
That’s exactly what the smart phone app PulsePoint (for download here) makes possible, according to Emergency Management. Using the gadgets we all carry every day, municipalities that use the free mobile service are able to send out alerts to CPR-certified citizens who are nearby someone in need. In many cases, there are just a few minutes between life and death, so every second counts. By quickening response times, this app can help save lives — before an ambulance is even in sight.
PulsePoint doesn’t replace dispatched responders, but as fast as ambulances and emergency medical technicians try to arrive, they’re often not quick enough. Once 9-1-1 is dialed and the available crew is actually with the patient, it can be too late – making those that can arrive quicker a vital resource.
San Jose became the first area city to use PulsePoint in 2012 — the app’s founder and CEO, Richard Price, is from the area, having worked as an ex-fire chief of the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District. Since then, it’s caught on thanks to support from a local hospital and the results it provides. A local hospital is also planning a public registry of automated defibrillators through a new, related app, PulsePoint AED.
With decreasing local budgets for emergency response, increasing populations and traffic congestion, the demand for innovations like PulsePoint is greater than ever. By alerting off-duty first responders, medical professionals, and other CPR certified individuals of a nearby need, PulsePoint turns them into valuable lifesavers, all with the tap of a phone, making the app early — and effective — when time means everything.

How Mobile Apps Help Local Governments Connect with Citizens

As Apple has taught us, for every daily issue we face — be it finding the name of a song or tracking a run — there’s an app for that.
And as more cities begin exploring the benefits of digital tools, mobile apps are quickly becoming a platform for civic engagement as well.
More Americans are more mobile than ever before, with 90 percent of the population toting a cell phone and more than half using a smartphone, the Pew Research Center finds. The phone, as government officials have found, is the quickest way to connect with local residents when it comes to anything from crime alerts to voting reminders. Which is why cities including Atlanta, Philadelphia and Chicago are tapping into Silicon Valley’s playbook in an effort to reconnect with residents.
Pioneering civic technologies is Boston, which has been touted as the first city to use a mobile app — Citizens Connect — to plug into its community. Launched in 2009, the app is designed similar to the city’s 311 hotline: Residents can report problems like potholes or graffiti by snapping a photo, tagging the location, and sending a report through the app. Users receive a tracking number and can monitor when the city fixes the issue. Authorities sometimes take as little as a day to send a response. Other cities have followed suit, including Philadelphia’s 311 and Mobile Citizen in Oakland, California.
Now, five years after launching Citizens Connect, Boston is again trailblazing civic technologies with the creation of the Design Action Research with Government (DARG) initiative.
The city office teamed up with Eric Gordon, director of the Engagement Game Laboratory at Emerson College, who examines how games and social media can impact urban life and democratic processes. Through DARG, Gordon and city officials will use a step-by-step approach to figure out what civic behavior is in need of change and what are the best tools to achieve that, according to Governing.

“It’s all about asking the right questions prior to deploying a civic app, so that the focus isn’t so much on absolute success or failure but finding insight or knowledge that a city can use,” said Gordon.

For example, officials found 38 percent of Citizens Connect users never used the app to look at other reports about the city, while the app generated little social media activity. While it’s important to see more governments use tools like Instagram to engage residents, Boston officials understand social media can play a much bigger role in community development.

“We keep asking ourselves: How do we know if we actually are impacting peoples’ lives?” said Nigel Jacob, co-chair of the Mayor’s Office of New Urban Mechanics.

Through DARG, Boston has launched Street Cred, an app directed toward measuring users civic engagement through a score based on their activities, akin to Klout.

Should the DARG evaluation be successful, Boston hopes to apply it to other civic apps cropping up. But Boston isn’t the only city aiming to connect with residents. Smaller cities are catching on, using apps like SeeClickFix, which supports setting up and connecting neighborhood watch groups with authorities; PublicStuff, an app similar to Citizens Connect that helps residents report issues directly to government officials; and Street Bump, which targets potholes and road pavement issues.

And more recently, the launch of  iCitizen is directed toward not only increasing civic engagement but also quelling voter apathy. Users can aggregate information from different media outlets about a variety of political issues on the app, serving as a nonpartisan, fact-based platform to inform citizens,  Politico reports.

“Everything from resilience to health and economic vitality of a city is tied to how well people are engaged,” said Jacob. “It’s in everyone’s best interests to encourage people to report their concerns and become engaged. We want to encourage that behavior.”

MORE: A National Effort to Boost Local Resources

A Hands-On Guide to Preserving Our Nation’s Historic Treasures

The problem facing historic buildings nationwide?
A huge backlog of overdue maintenance that’s in dire need of completion, with an estimated cost of $4.5 billion just for Park Service structures alone, according to the PBS NewsHour.
Adding to the problem is that the workers who perform skilled restoration work are aging. So is there any solution?
The National Trust for Historic Preservation has partnered with the National Park Service and other groups to launch a pilot project, Hands-On Preservation Experience, or HOPE, that provides young people with jobs as it trains them to restore aging structures.
One such project already underway is at Skyland Stables in Virginia’s Shenandoah Mountains, where experienced craftsman David Logan guides students in restoring the structure that was built as a WPA project during the 1930’s. Logan, who owns the restoration company Vintage, Inc., told Jeffrey Brown of PBS NewsHour, “What I have done is guided the team just on some approaches for replacing siding, ways of cutting out the old, and then how to handle the oak to let it move, and just little tips and advice.”
The students earn $10 an hour, compared to $40-$60 an hour a contractor might charge, but also gain valuable skills in the process. Logan said to Brown that he sees fewer tradespeople learning about historic preservation these days.
One of the students is Elijah Smith of Washington, D.C. “I think it’s important to save old buildings, because when you go back, you can see what you did right, what you did wrong, how you want to add ideas to it. And the older something is, the more value it is to it. It brings more people to it,” he said.
Not only does this program shore up some of our nation’s treasures, but it provides youth with a new career path, too.
MORE: Two Wrongs That Make A Right