What America Can Learn About Retirement From Australia

As the baby boomers begin entering their golden years, the United States is bracing for a retirement crisis that could change the system entirely. Longer life expectancy, rising costs of living, soaring health care expenses and an unstable public safety net could mean the next few generations are in for a bumpy ride when it comes to retirement.
In fact, about half of the country doesn’t have the savings to be able to maintain their current standard of living after retirement, Marketwatch reports. The Boston College Center for Retirement Research’s “National Retirement Risk Index,” which measures the portion of the population that can expect to be financially comfortable in retirement, found that number jumps to 60 percent among low-income workers, but hangs at 40 percent among higher-paid workers — painting a pretty bleak picture for Americans.
On the other side of the world, however, Australia has found a solution to ensuring a stable retirement for its citizens — and Americans should pay attention. Currently, more than 90 percent of employed Australians save for their golden years, representing an estimated $1.6 trillion in savings for the nation’s economy as of June 2013, the consulting firm Deloitte found.
But it wasn’t an overnight change of behavior for the Aussies. In fact, Australians shared the American sentiment about retirement until 1992, when the government created a mandatory savings program that required employers to contribute 9 percent of an employee’s salary to a retirement account for workers between 18 and 70.

“Only a few people received good retirement programs — people who worked for companies or the public sector,” said Jeremy Duffield, chairman of the Australian Centre for Financial Studies, an academic think tank. “Large groups of the population had no coverage at all.”

The “Superannuation Guarantee” program enables employees to pick which fund they want to invest their cash in, similar to a mutual fund or a public-sector group, the National Journal reports. The three-pronged system also relies on voluntary savings, which only around 20 percent of people take advantage of, and a means-tested government pension program similar to the U.S. Social Security system. Susan Thorp, the chair of finance and superannuation at the University of Technology in Sydney, estimates about 75 percent of Australian senior citizens take advantage of at least a partial means-tested pension.

In recent years, the Australian government has amended the program, with a schedule increase of the employer contribution, upping it to 12 percent by 2020, while eligibility for a means-tested pension will rise from age 65 to 67 over the next decade.

But Thorp estimates Australians between age 60 and 65 have around $170,000 in Aussie dollars saved in these compulsory accounts. Americans could stand to benefit from a model with a mandatory component like the Superannuation Guarantee, as only about half of U.S. workers receive retirement coverage through employers or institutions.

The Australian program also includes stringent rules about withdrawing money from the superannuation, which subsequently leads to a comfortable nest egg as residents head toward retirement. Meanwhile, the United States 401(k) model allows Americans to break into the account prematurely to pay off loans or in the wake of unemployment.

But much like our 401(k), the superannuation program comes with financial responsibility and individual choice. And that’s one area that Australia could stand to improve. Duffield points to a low financial literacy rate among Australians, who may not be paying attention to how their money is invested and the fees that apply.

But financial literacy aside, one of the biggest challenges in implementing the system is political will, which could pose a problem with gridlock and partisan attitudes gripping Congress. But it’s something that politicians need to look at seriously, as more Americans begin to retire. After all, as Australia has demonstrated over the last 22 years, committing to a plan can pave the way for a better future — one that’s more golden than the current outlook here in the United States.

MORE: 1 in 4 Can’t Retire Through Their Employer in Connecticut. Now the State Is Changing That.

Could a National Sales Tax Ease American Inequality?

The U.S. has one of the highest levels of income inequality among the world’s industrialized nations. The imbalance between rich and the poor is a popular political topic — President Barack Obama even focused his State of the Union address on the issue. Michigan State University law professor Reuven S. Avi-Yonah has an idea that he can help: he wants to implement a national sales tax.
MORE: This State May Have Discovered the Secret to Saving Tax Dollars While Doing Good
Sure, this idea is probably at the very top of the list for politically unpopular topics, but don’t write Avi-Yonah off just yet. By using the Gini Coefficient, a measure of statistical dispersion that represents income distribution, Avi-Yonah discovered that income inequality in the U.S. is on the rise while social mobility is on the decline, making it one of the most unequal developed economies, while countries like Germany and Japan are more balanced. By comparing the U.S. to these countries, he found a clear difference: the presence of a national sales tax — or, more specifically, a value added tax (VAT). While states levy a sales tax on consumers who purchase goods and services, funds from a national sales tax could go even further.  “One key to reducing inequality in the U.S. is to bolster the social safety net,” Avi-Yonah writes in his report.
But why a national sales tax over other forms of funding? For one, these types of taxes are used in more than 150 countries and have a demonstrated ability to raise revenues. VATs are not income taxes, which are easy for some Americans to avoid and can discourage work. Sales taxes are also paid by all members of society — the old and young, rich and poor. Plus, a sales tax is cheaper to administer than income taxes. Sound like a no-brainer? Well, try getting any new tax past congress.
 ALSO: How to Get People to Save When All They Want to Do Is Play the Lottery