Nasdaq’s Economic Opportunity Summit

On October 6, Nasdaq convened its Economic Opportunity Summit — a half-day of panel discussions built on the legacy of its Purpose Forum designed to bring together innovators, policy experts, and business leaders under one roof to talk about what economic prosperity really looks like in 2025 and beyond. 

Centering questions of how we can expand access, revitalize communities, and drive inclusive, purpose-led growth, the day’s agenda ranged from rethinking how we measure prosperity to reimagining regional ecosystems, integrating capital with opportunity, and amplifying authentic storytelling as a force for change.

Below are some of the key insights from the event.


The New Company Town

1. Regional revitalization depends on intentional investment in education and ecosystems. Innovation isn’t confined to Silicon Valley — it’s taking root in cities and regions across the U.S. The Nasdaq Entrepreneurial Center’s Advancing Regional Innovation Economies Report maps where inclusive innovation is thriving, using data to highlight communities effectively linking education, research, and entrepreneurship. The findings show that regions with strong R1 and R2 universities, early-stage capital networks, and coordinated civic leadership see the highest GDP and talent growth.

2. Purpose-driven business is good business. Data shows that companies with purpose-driven values outperform peers across metrics like employee retention, innovation, and return on capital. With 94% of Gen Z workers unwilling to join companies that lack a clear social purpose, aligning corporate impact with community investment has become both an ethical and financial imperative.

3. The power of “co-op-etition.” For the Dallas Economic Development Corporation, success is built on a blend of fierce competition and deep collaboration between the private sector, government, and education. From streamlined permitting processes to customized workforce training and a tax-friendly environment, Dallas has become a national model for business attraction and ease of doing business.

4. Culture is a critical driver of economic growth. Panelists emphasized that vibrant arts, culture, and community life are not extras — they’re economic infrastructure. Investments in cultural institutions, public green spaces, and livable neighborhoods attract top talent and strengthen social cohesion. 

The Power of Possibility (featuring Jenny Just, co-founder and managing partner at Peak6 Investments and Sloane Stephens, professional athlete and founder of the Sloane Stephens Foundation):

1. The power of possibility begins with saying yes. Jenny Just’s career started on the trading floor — a male-dominated world where she learned early that opportunity often hides behind uncertainty. “I never said no,” she said. That willingness to try, to pivot, and to persist built a fintech empire from an initial $1.6 million family-and-friends investment into multiple multi-billion-dollar businesses. Her message: Don’t wait for the perfect plan — just begin, stay curious, and adapt.

2. Purpose fuels perseverance. For Sloane Stephens, the power of possibility comes from passion and persistence. What began as a neighborhood tennis hobby became a global platform for impact. Through the Sloane Stephens Foundation, she now helps youth see that the world is their oyster, providing access to sports, education, and mentorship so they can imagine bigger futures for themselves.

3. Failure is not fatal — it’s formative. Both speakers reframed failure as essential training. They urged audiences to embrace iteration — failure as a rep in the gym that builds the muscle of resilience.

4. Confidence at the table changes everything. Just’s current mission — to teach one million women and girls to play poker — isn’t about cards, but about confidence. Poker, she said, teaches risk-taking, capital allocation, and negotiation — the same skills needed in the boardroom. “If we teach our daughters to play poker,” she said, “we can change the world.”

Tracking Prosperity: How do we Measure Economic Impact?

1. GDP is essential — but incomplete. Panelists agreed that GDP remains a vital benchmark for assessing economic activity, but it is a blunt instrument that fails to capture inclusion, equity, or quality of growth. Global growth projections have declined from 3.7% pre-pandemic to just above 3% today, threatening income convergence and poverty reduction. We need complementary indicators that measure sustainability, inclusion, and balance — not just output.

2. Data granularity reveals who’s thriving and who’s being left behind. Panelists emphasized the importance of individual-level, real-time data to understand how families and small businesses are faring across income, race, and gender lines, and cautioned against aggregate indicators, which mask critical disparities.

3. Inclusive growth requires better data on how opportunity actually moves through the economy. Built through a collaboration between the Schultz Family Foundation, Harvard Business School, and the Burning Glass Institute, the American Opportunity Index uses millions of real career records to measure how well large employers enable upward mobility — tracking promotions, pay growth, and internal advancement. Now in its fourth year, the Index’s findings challenge assumptions about where opportunity lives: in many cases, frontline roles at mid-sized firms outperform brand-name employers on career progress. By turning workforce data into public benchmarks, the Index gives companies a roadmap to improve mobility outcomes and helps policymakers and investors identify where inclusive growth is genuinely taking root.

4. The future of prosperity depends on inclusion and adaptability. The panel closed with concern over asymmetries in the labor market — a mismatch between where jobs are disappearing (including software roles affected by AI) and where demand is rising. Without stronger education-to-employment pipelines and retraining systems, AI and automation risk deepening inequality rather than reducing it. New research from the Schultz Family Foundation and HarrisX recently put a name to this disconnect: the broken marketplace. The call to action: design data-informed policies that help workers move, not just survive, through economic transition.

Uniting Capital with Opportunity

1. Homeownership remains central to wealth creation—but new models are needed. In 1985, a teacher’s salary was one-third the price of a home; today, it is one-tenth. Shared appreciation lending models like those being pioneered by Homium help to connect capital markets directly to first-time homebuyers and can serve as unlocks that help teachers, nurses, and first responders afford homes in the communities in which they work.

2. Expanding stock ownership can narrow the wealth gap. Disparities in stock ownership are the single largest driver of the racial wealth gap, which is why companies like Ownership Works have taken up the mantle of ensuring that all employees — from the CEO to the front line workers — are partial owners through free equity grants. In addition to generating billions in payouts, ownership also results in greater engagement, lower attrition, and tangible financial gains for workers.

3. The next five years will test whether innovation can reach the people who need it most. Panelists envisioned a future where innovation serves teachers as much as tech executives. From portable lifelong savings accounts launched at birth to scalable models of employee ownership and affordable homeownership, they argued that aligning incentives between capital and community is the key to inclusive prosperity. 

4. Transforming the language of investing is just as critical as transforming its systems. The Transforming Investor Identity Research Report — a national pilot by Commonwealth with support from the Nasdaq Foundation — is a model for shifting cultural perceptions of what it means to be an investor. By studying how individuals see themselves in relation to investing, the research surfaces both structural and psychological barriers that keep millions from building wealth. Its findings challenge institutions to expand access not just through new products, but through new narratives — ones that connect financial inclusion to agency, identity, and long-term confidence.

Seizing Your Power (featuring Tiffany Dufu, President of the Tory Burch Foundation)

1. Storytelling is a leadership superpower. Dufu emphasized that “purpose isn’t mystical — it’s a decision inspired by your lived experiences.” By rooting leadership in personal narrative, individuals can clarify their purpose and communicate it authentically to others. The stories we choose to tell — like Dufu’s story of her mother breaking cycles of poverty — shape how we lead, what we stand for, and how effectively we inspire others.

2. Authenticity must live through behavior, not branding. Authenticity isn’t found on a company’s website or in its values statement, it’s revealed through daily actions. Dufu praised leaders who “send the elevator back down,” mentoring and supporting others in tangible ways. True purpose, she said, “has to manifest and live through the behavior of people, always.”

3. Rewriting the narrative of entrepreneurship. Dufu challenged prevailing myths that entrepreneurship is “too risky” or reserved for others. She urged women to redefine entrepreneurship as an extension of their grit and problem-solving, not an unreachable identity. 

4. The Tory Burch Foundation is scaling women’s economic power. Under Dufu’s leadership, the foundation has unlocked $342 million in economic impact to date and aims to surpass $1 billion by 2030. Its decade-long Fellows Program boasts a 91% business survival rate and focuses on helping women build multi-million-dollar enterprises by providing access to mentorship, markets, and capital — not just funding but a “sisterhood of founders” who help each other scale and succeed.

The State of Create: Exploring the Economic Impact of the Influencer

1. The term “influencer” is evolving into something more entrepreneurial. Panelists agreed that while “influencer” has picked up negative connotations, it still best captures the breadth of what creators do. One panelist observed that creators are “entrepreneurs building businesses around community,” while another mused that even C-suite executives now count as creators if they’re sharing expertise and building engaged audiences.

2. Agency and authenticity are driving Gen Z’s creator ambitions. Younger generations aren’t just seeking fame — they’re seeking freedom. The ability to build a media company from your phone makes content creation deeply appealing. Gen Z and Gen Alpha see it as a path to autonomy, creative control, and purpose-driven expression.

3. Monetization is becoming more democratized and diverse. Panelists highlighted how creators now monetize earlier and through multiple streams: direct fan support, brand deals, donations, speaking engagements, and ad revenue. Twitch’s affiliate model enables creators to earn income from day one, while others use partnerships and media opportunities to sustain free, educational content.

4. AI and trust will define the next era of influence. While creators see AI as a powerful tool for efficiency and safety moderation, panelists warned of its risks, including the rise of deepfake ads that can mimic a creator’s likeness, threatening the trust that underpins their relationship with audiences. Panelists agreed that more guardrails are needed in order to protect human authenticity and connection moving forward.

Breaking Barriers, Building Opportunity: Investing in Impact

1. The women’s sports “movement” isn’t a moment, it’s a systems reset. During the 2019 Women’s World Cup, Team USA’s victory and equal pay lawsuit revealed a glaring disconnect between audience enthusiasm and industry investment. Women’s sports weren’t lacking talent or audience — they were trapped in outdated business models measured by men’s sports metrics like reach and efficiency. 

2. Athletes must have a seat at the business table. Sue Bird — WNBA Champion, Olympic Gold Medalist, and Hall of Famer  — joined Deep Blue to bridge the gap between athletes and advertisers, bringing firsthand perspective to boardrooms often devoid of lived experience. Their collaboration ensures that partnerships are authentic, relevant, and reflective of real athletic culture — not filtered through outdated creative briefs.

3. Authenticity and engagement matter more than reach. Bird emphasized that the women’s sports community thrives on depth of connection rather than scale. This authenticity gives brands higher long-term value, transforming athletes into trusted cultural partners rather than traditional endorsers.

4. Purposeful partnerships drive cultural and economic returns. Deep Blue’s “Stay Ready” campaign with MassMutual spotlighted three athletes at different career stages, connecting financial readiness with empowerment and longevity. Rather than restricting it to “women’s sports” media, the campaign ran across March Madness, NBA Finals, and business networks — proving that women’s sports stories can outperform when told universally.

Practical Applications for AI in Impact Work

Although AI is poised to change and reshape many contours of our economy and lived experience, few among us express confidence in putting it to use in our day-to-day work.

That’s why, on September 16, NationSwell convened a group of peer leaders for a virtual roundtable focused on immediate, practical applications for AI on impact teams. From day to day low-lift use cases to opportunities for mission delivery, attendees explored how leaders are using generative AI – and increasingly agentic AI – to increase speed, clarity, and capacity in core workflows.

Some of the key takeaways from the event appear below:


Key takeaways:

Recognize that adoption is widely happening in the impact sector. The majority of social sector staff are experimenting with generative AI tools in their work, even if they don’t consider themselves advanced users or have streamlined guidance in the workplace. This signals opportunity and a responsibility to provide structure and support.

Democratize access to AI. Smaller nonprofits often lack the capital to experiment and funders can be discouraged to invest without tech experience. However, investing in organizational capacity through AI training, tools, or peer learning communities ensures that nonprofits can participate fully in the AI era.

Navigate the shared learning curve together. Nonprofit leaders and funders are all learning together—often unsure what to budget, request, or approve. This affirms the importance of shared guidance, education, and implementing standards that are critical for progress.

Establish governance and guidelines that protect your organization and its data. Large corporations can rely on private licensing and built-in governance systems to safeguard data shared with AI models. Nonprofits, by contrast, often depend on public tools, underscoring the need for risk management.

Start AI integration incrementally, not exponentially. For non-tech affluent organizations, beginning with small, incremental applications of AI—such as using off-the-shelf tools for efficiency—is more effective than jumping immediately to large-scale projects. The most practical applications are those that strengthen existing processes like fundraising, program design, or communications.

Build AI strategies into organizational roadmaps. Organizations can create customized AI roadmaps that reflect their priorities and capabilities, ensuring alignment with mission. For example, a nonprofit has an upcoming fundraising cycle that includes 5 key phases. For each of those phases, the nonprofit identifies incremental steps to integrate AI to enhance efficiency. 

Shift from individual to collective AI use. While many staff are experimenting with AI on their own, organizations unlock far greater value when they standardize usage. Meta-prompts and custom GPTs help move beyond scattered adoption and enable teams to work in alignment, share best practices, and ensure outputs reflect organizational priorities.

Scale responsibly with trusted principles. Growth in AI adoption should not outpace organizational values. Embedding equity, transparency, and bias prevention from the outset establishes a foundation of trust with staff, partners, and communities. By treating responsible AI use as a living framework—one that adapts as technologies and risks evolve—organizations can scale confidently while safeguarding.

Inclusive Approaches to Workforce Innovation

As the global economy undergoes rapid transformation driven by digital innovation and artificial intelligence, the future of work demands a new approach—one that centers inclusion, equity, and adaptability.

During a virtual Leader Roundtable hosted on September 10, NationSwell members unpacked how integrating digital fluency into skilled trades training, advancing skills-based hiring, and designing accessible learning pathways that center future-ready skills can help build a more inclusive and representative workforce.

Key takeaways:

  • Design training programs in close partnership with employers. Employer-informed curricula and training ensure learners are trained for actual demand, not theoretical needs. Models like customized training tracks for data center technicians show how alignment with industry can lead to placement rates above 80% and help close gaps in fast-evolving fields.
  • Build agility into workforce initiatives. Instead of long planning cycles, programs can adopt short pilots, rapid iteration, and feedback loops to adapt quickly. This allows leaders to experiment, take risks, and scale what works — an approach critical in a labor market reshaped by AI and automation.
  • Pair technical training with wraparound supports. Barriers like childcare, transportation, housing, or career navigation often determine whether someone can complete training. Embedding these supports — sometimes through cross-sector partnerships — translates access into real outcomes, especially for women, parents, and workers from historically excluded groups.
  • Strengthen social capital alongside skills. Networks matter as much as technical ability in securing jobs. Programs that cultivate alumni pipelines, peer mentorship, and hiring networks replicate the advantages of traditional social capital and help level the playing field in an era where AI screening increases applicant volume.
  • Break down silos in education and training. Cross-disciplinary programs that cut across engineering, data science, environmental science, and business better prepare students for the complex, blended challenges industries face. Universities that shift from teaching “departments” to solving cross-disciplinary “problems” are modeling the future of workforce education.
  • Engage communities where new industries take root. Data centers, renewable energy hubs, and advanced manufacturing facilities are creating jobs in rural areas, but also raising concerns around land use, environmental impact, and neighborliness. Leaders who pair workforce investment with intentional community dialogue and benefit-sharing will unlock more durable opportunities.
  • Invest in real-time labor market intelligence. Traditional labor data lags six to nine months, often missing critical inflection points. By collecting live input from job seekers, students, and employers — and analyzing it with AI — leaders can spot emerging trends earlier, respond faster, and avoid over- or under-investing in certain skills.
  • Reframe high-demand industries to attract the next generation. Manufacturing and skilled trades are increasingly automated, tech-driven, and well-paid, but remain plagued by outdated perceptions. Recasting these jobs as high-tech, sustainable, and future-focused is essential to inspire young people and address looming talent shortages.
  • Expose young people to career pathways early and often. Many students simply don’t know what opportunities exist or how their skills connect to them. Career awareness programs, mentorship at the high school level, and early exposure to applied training help bridge the gap between education and the jobs of tomorrow.
  • Expand inclusive on-ramps for nontraditional learners. Talent often sits outside four-year institutions. Short-term credentials, apprenticeships, and alternative pipelines — combined with recognition of prior learning — allow individuals from varied backgrounds to enter high-demand fields and build economic mobility.

Explore how NationSwell’s Workforce Innovation Collaborative is charting a more inclusive path forward to ensure the future of work works for everyone.

Preparing for Your 2026 Resourcing Conversations

During the time of year when many impact leaders are preparing their 2026 budgets – and making their case for sustained or increased funding — NationSwell convened a virtual Leader Roundtable dedicated to providing a space for our community to connect on best practices, talking points, and novel approaches for making the case for investment, accessing adjacent budgets through deeper business alignment, and navigating stakeholder dynamics with confidence.

Some of the key takeaways from the discussion appear below:


Key takeaways

Advance multi-channel resourcing strategies. Organizations can adapt to flat or reduced budgets by creatively aligning with discretionary funds, cross-departmental resources, and pro bono assets. Embedding impact priorities into broader business strategies supports continued relevance and resilience in constrained financial environments.

Elevate holistic definitions of corporate giving. Leaders are moving beyond foundation dollars to account for the “totality of giving,” including volunteerism, product donations, and operational investments. Tracking and celebrating these broader contributions helps unlock hidden value and provides a fuller picture of corporate impact to key stakeholders.

Benchmark against peers while embracing discretion. Companies are increasingly willing to share impact data in aggregate but hesitant to disclose specifics, reflecting reputational sensitivities. Collective benchmarking can guide strategic planning while respecting privacy, and offers opportunities to highlight product-based and in-kind giving models as complements to cash philanthropy.

Embed executive sponsorship in impact initiatives. Executive champions can unlock access to budgets, headcount, and expertise across the enterprise. Formal sponsorship programs and structured “away models” for employee participation provide scalable ways to extend impact teams without new headcount.

Balance visibility and employee engagement in shifting climates. With many corporations opting for quieter public-facing stances, there is a growing emphasis on internal employee engagement. Nonprofits can adapt and embrace this momentum by providing safe  and risk-aware opportunities to corporate partners. 

Promote cross-sector collaboration to meet systemic challenges. Leaders are eager for truth-seeking and collective momentum in a moment where organizations are largely working in silos. Building integrated approaches that link corporate assets, nonprofit expertise, and public funding streams can build shared resilience in the face of economic, environmental, and compliance pressures.

Leverage AI and technology responsibly for capacity-building. With fundraising and impact teams already stretched, enterprise AI tools can provide efficiencies – but must be deployed with clear guardrails to ensure ethical use, compliance, and trust. 

Effective Board Service for Impact Leaders

Board service can be one of the most meaningful and influential ways to contribute your leadership, but only if you’re on the right board, and clear on how to drive value once you’re there.

On August 14, NationSwell hosted a virtual roundtable designed to explore the full board journey: how to identify and pursue the right opportunities, what various types of organizations truly need from their board members, and how to show up with strategic clarity and purpose.

Some of the key takeaways from the discussion appear below:

Key takeaways

Understand the differences between serving on a corporate and a nonprofit board. For corporate boards, you have a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders of the company. The expectations for how you will engage are high, as you are being compensated and are expected to hold your service as your first priority. Nonprofit boards require a fiduciary responsibility to the organization, and more specifically, a commitment to raise funds and open doors.

Assess how the board landscape is adapting to pressing issues of the day. Boards are highly responsive to changes in policy and regulation for topics like cybersecurity, sustainability, diversity, etc. Knowing if and how you can leverage your expertise will indicate your fit and add value to your service.

Serve knowing that you are entering a mutual commitment, not just a resume-builder. Serving on a board requires you to contribute time, energy, resources, and a willingness to share your expertise. Understand that you bring distinct value to the role, while also respecting the unique mission and leadership of the organization.

Recognize that board service is both opportunity and risk. While board service offers visibility, influence, and professional growth, it also carries accountability. Public company directors may be targeted in activist campaigns or voted off by shareholders, while nonprofit directors carry fundraising expectations and reputational risks. Enter with eyes wide open.

Balance oversight with trust to enable strategic governance. The most successful boards know how to ask strategic questions and provide accountability without overstepping into day-to-day management. While access to the entire management team is an indicator of a highly functioning board, always remember, “noses in, fingers out.”

Evaluate the best time for you to serve. Factors that contribute to ideal timing include your capacity, your employer’s willingness to support your service, and your ability to weather the storms of a company or organization. Mutual readiness can also be evaluated by undergoing a financial and cultural assessment of the company/organization to determine fit.

Beyond the Backlash: What’s Next for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

Threats facing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) accelerated dramatically in early 2025 as new Executive Orders exerted significant pressure on companies, funders, and nonprofits to retreat from their DEI practices. The EOs and surrounding political scrutiny have led some organizations to walk back their commitments and decrease their investments. Others – propelled forward by their investors, employees, and organizational goals – are finding new ways to sustain momentum while remaining in compliance with relevant laws.

On August 5, NationSwell hosted a virtual Leader Roundtable dedicated to taking stock of the latest developments shaping the future of DEI and surfacing the practices, models, and pivots that are helping organizations navigate challenges, protect gains, and create more inclusive, equitable workplaces and communities.

Some of the key takeaways from the discussion appear below:

Insights:

1. Flexibility is a strength — but values must remain non-negotiable. Organizations are adapting language, public messaging, and branding in response to political pressures, but those with the most clarity and confidence are grounding decisions in their mission, legal frameworks, and long-held values. This internal consistency and moral clarity helps to ensure that external adjustments don’t dilute internal commitments.

2. Internal alignment and transparent communication are essential. Clear messaging to staff — especially during times of change — helps maintain trust and cohesion. Leaders are prioritizing employee engagement, addressing concerns proactively, and reinforcing shared purpose in order to sustain morale and minimize confusion. Internal stakeholders and employees need to understand that the mission hasn’t shifted — just the framing.

3. Crisis response teams and task forces are becoming essential infrastructure. Organizations are formalizing cross-functional groups to navigate fast-moving political, legal, and reputational risks. These teams — which often include legal, HR, communications, and policy stakeholders — enable coordinated responses and reduce the burden on DEI leaders to go it alone.

4. Fear and confusion among leadership requires intentional re-grounding. Allies who once championed DEI work are now hesitant, unsure of legal limits or public repercussions. Supporting leaders to revisit their “why,” and equipping them with clear, values-driven language, helps prevent unnecessary retreats and builds back courage.

5. Staff engagement and inclusion remain top priorities. Changes to DEI language or visibility can be felt deeply by internal teams. Organizations are leaning into listening sessions, transparent rationales, and co-created strategies to ensure staff feel included and aligned — even when choices are tough.

6. DEI work is becoming more decentralized — but must remain coherent. In large or distributed organizations, responses to the current climate can vary across regions, teams, or departments. While local nuance matters, leaders are working to ensure that the organization’s equity efforts remain coherent, consistent, and strategically aligned.

7. A shared learning and support ecosystem is crucial for leadership stamina. This work is emotionally and politically taxing. Leaders are finding strength in peer networks, cross-sector convenings, and informal “circles of care” that offer solidarity, shared tools, and a place to strategize in real time.

8. Courage is contagious—and still required. Amid a climate of uncertainty, principled leadership remains essential. Whether through bold public statements or quiet consistency, organizations can lead by example — affirming that even strategic compromise can be paired with moral clarity.

Leadership and Wellness

amidst challenging leadership moments and an ever-shifting political landscape, it is more important than ever that leaders continue to prioritize their mental and physical wellness.

On July 24, NationSwell convened a virtual conversation designed to surface some of the most effective and compassionate ways leaders are pausing to prioritize their own well-being as they continue to prioritize the wellbeing of their constituents. Below are some of the key takeaways from the discussion:

Insights:

Success needs a new definition – one that includes well-being. Too often, we tie success to output, speed, and sacrifice. But working harder can come at a high cost. Leaders, organizations, and ultimately society must reframe success to include rest, healing, and sustainability. Consider building rest directly into your calendar as you would any strategic priority.

Rest is leadership, not luxury. Pausing isn’t a sign of weakness, it’s a signal of trust in your team, your systems, and yourself. Leaders who design their schedules with space to breathe are often the ones who perform more consistently and inspire more deeply.

Well-being must be designed into the system. You can’t expect wellness without infrastructure. That means clear organizational values around self-care, adequate time off, accessible benefits, and consistent tools like anonymous feedback surveys and employee pulse checks – all backed by leadership commitment. Build cross-functional teams to own wellbeing, use data to identify pain points, and report progress transparently. 

Cultures of care require both help-seeking and help-giving. Mental health isn’t just an individual responsibility. Teams need to be trained not just to ask for help, but to proactively offer it by checking in when something seems off and having clear protocols for stepping in and covering for one another.

Vulnerability is a leadership skill. When leaders name their own limits, they give others permission to do the same. Modeling moments like “I’m not okay today” or “I need to step back” signals to your team that care isn’t conditional.

Psychological safety has to be intentional. People won’t take emotional risks in environments that punish uncertainty. Leaders must codify psychological safety into how meetings run, how feedback is given, and how mistakes are handled.

Curiosity is an underused superpower. Real leadership starts with self-inquiry. Asking “What am I not trusting?” or “What story am I telling myself that might no longer serve me?” helps unlock authenticity and opens space for honest team communication. External culture shifts only stick when leaders have done the inner work. That means questioning outdated self-identities, naming your own fears, and leading from alignment.

Manager training is critical, not optional. You can’t build a healthy culture if the people managing day-to-day interactions aren’t equipped to handle hard conversations with care. Invest in developing emotional fluency, conflict navigation, and compassion-based leadership at every level.

From Intention to Reality: Unlocking the Promise of Collective Impact

Within the social impact ecosystem, there is widespread commitment to collaboration and partnership. Yet true collective impact remains challenging for many organizations and leaders. Structural silos, misaligned incentives, and resource constraints often stand in the way of catalytic, cross-sector action.

On July 24, NationSwell hosted a virtual leader roundtable designed to explore what it really takes to move from good intentions to meaningful progress. Some of the most salient insights that surfaced during that discussion appear below:

Insights:

Build with, not for — shifting from transactional partnerships to transformational relationships. Designing together and listening deeply to partners leads to more meaningful, inclusive outcomes. Be intentional about trust-building by consistently showing up and acknowledging power dynamics.

Engage your community continuously, not episodically. Building trust requires regular, structured engagement throughout the year. This goes beyond one-time listening sessions and reflects a long-haul investment in shared learning.

Avoid duplication by aligning efforts, clarifying purpose, and reducing unnecessary convenings. Streamlining meetings and mapping resources promotes more effective use of time, helps eliminate redundancy, and fosters better collaboration.

Embrace healthy tension as a part of the process. Tension between governance-building and action, between urgency and trust-building, and between funders and partners is inevitable. Recognizing and naming that tension upfront allows groups to move through it productively, rather than stalling out.

Participate in cross-pollination to unlock innovation and increase impact. Move beyond traditional silos to intentionally engage diverse actors across sectors. By designing multi-stakeholder strategies that reflect the full ecosystem, collaborations can create more resilient solutions.

Use intermediaries to accelerate timelines in ways direct funding may not. Strategic use of intermediaries allows for flexible deployment of resources while reducing burden and capacity constraints on grassroots partners. Additionally, funders should think strategically about how policy changes (like the 1% tax floor on charitable donations) affect capital flow, and how to advocate for approaches that ensure funds reach those most in need.

Ask the right questions and focus on meaningful indicators to avoid data paralysis. For example, “Ripples of Impact” is a reframe for ROI that considers how collaborations shift practices, build trust, and catalyze long-term ecosystem change. It’s not about volume of data, but whether it drives action and adaptation. 

The Art of Connection: Strategies for Effective Networking

Networking doesn’t stop when you reach senior leadership—it evolves. Maintaining strong professional connections is essential for staying ahead of industry trends, fostering innovation, and building strategic partnerships that drive success.

On June 11, NationSwell hosted a virtual Leader Roundtable designed to explore why networking remains critical at the highest levels of leadership and provide actionable strategies to strengthen and utilize networks for personal and organizational success.

Some of the key takeaways from the discussion appear below:


Key Takeaways

Be grounded in who you are, and build your network with that identity in mind. Your geography, industry, and function shape your networking identity. Reframing how you position yourself  depending on which of these three you emphasize can unlock new opportunities, especially when transitioning between industries or roles.

Focus on authenticity, clarity, and brevity to strengthen your outreach. When initiating new contact, be concise and clear about who you are, what you need, and why it matters. Thoughtful communication builds trust and leaves a lasting impression.

Remember that the scope of networking is broad and personalized. Networking can serve many purposes from seeking board roles and public speaking engagements to navigating a career transition. Use your network as both a sounding board and a launchpad. Additionally, networking is most effective when it’s simplified and personal. Whether you’re exploring new career options or looking for a restaurant recommendation, treat networking as a tool for mutual exchange. Even transactional requests are welcomed; most people are flattered to be asked for help or to be known as a go-to resource.

Make networking for a career transition a volume and timing game. A thorough job search may take 5–6 months and involve 120–150 conversations, each interaction building momentum. While outcomes will vary, meaningful opportunities often come from a few individuals who go the extra mile. Relationships are often the key to opening a new door.

Invest in a multigenerational, cross-sector network. Engaging with people across industries and age groups broadens your perspective, expands opportunity, and keeps you relevant. Building internal, cross-functional relationships within your organization is also essential for increasing visibility and bridging teams.

Tend to your network like a garden. It requires consistent care, outreach, and attention. Use travel, spontaneous calls, or quick notes to nurture connections even when you don’t need anything. Intentional relationship-building starts long before a need arises, and continues over time.

The Broken Marketplace: Tackling America’s School-to-Work Crisis

Across the country, too many young people are doing everything right — working jobs, enrolling in training, and seeking advice — only to find themselves stuck. Despite their effort and ambition, the pathway to a stable, fulfilling adulthood has grown increasingly murky. New research from the Schultz Family Foundation and HarrisX puts a name to this disconnect: a broken marketplace. In this labor and education ecosystem, jobs go unfilled while talent goes underrecognized, and the traditional systems of guidance — school counselors, college degrees, even parental advice — no longer align with what the market demands. It’s a system that leaves too many behind — particularly young people from under-resourced communities, who are often navigating without a map.

To surface solutions and spark collaboration, SFF teamed up with NationSwell and LinkedIn on July 15 to convene some of the leading thinkers, practitioners, and changemakers exploring what it will take to fix this broken marketplace. The conversation spanned everything from the promise and pitfalls of AI, to the cultural overvaluation of four-year degrees, to the structural barriers facing youth who are working hard but treading water. While the dialogue surfaced powerful models and bright spots, it also revealed a shared hunger for something deeper: a reimagined system that meets young people where they are, honors their full potential, and builds pathways that are truly navigable, equitable, and aligned with the future of work.

Below are some of the most salient insights that surfaced during the discussion — and a few questions we’re still asking.


Fast Stats:

  • 30 million young people in the U.S. are struggling, with roughly 15 million classified as underemployed or unemployed.
  • Only 8% of high schoolers feel confident about their post-graduation plans.
  • 86% of high school leaders say they recognize the importance of postsecondary planning — yet workforce readiness is still not meaningfully integrated into most school systems.
  • While 71% of employers say there are enough opportunities for job seekers, only 43% of young adults agree
  • Only 24% of parents claim to leverage school resources like guidance counselors and teachers.
  • 73% of parents see their child as having direction or purpose on their own and not needing help.
  • Only 35% of young adults report knowing exactly what drives them
  • More than half of young adults say they do not believe that college offers the guarantee of a good job.

Insights:

  • The labor market is experiencing a skills and credential mismatch. There’s a growing imbalance between the number of college-educated workers and the actual demand for degree-dependent roles. Simultaneously, there are increasing opportunities for non-degree workers — especially those with the right technical or vocational skills — which signals the need to reassess postsecondary education strategies.
  • Millions of young people — especially women — currently feel unprepared to enter the current U.S. job market. Despite performing well academically in adolescence, a growing number of young women report feeling unready for the workforce as they approach adulthood. This decline in self-confidence appears to stem from a mix of systemic and social pressures: cultural expectations around caregiving, implicit biases in hiring, and a lack of tailored support for young mothers or women from low-income households.
  • AI offers both promise and risk; it’s up to us to shape the outcomes. While artificial intelligence has the potential to revolutionize education, guidance, and workforce development, its impacts will depend entirely on how we design and deploy it. Leaders must proactively steer AI toward equitable and beneficial uses instead of passively responding to its disruptions.
  • The jobs of the future will demand radically different skills. By 2030, 70% of the skills required for many jobs are projected to shift. This rapid evolution places tremendous pressure on workers, educators, and employers to anticipate change, reskill continuously, and adapt to a moving target.
  • We must not leave vulnerable communities behind in the AI era. Historically marginalized populations — especially those without college degrees — face the greatest risk of being left out of the AI-driven economy. It’s critical to design tools, supports, and systems that center their needs from the start.
  • There is a growing mismatch between college degrees and job outcomes. Despite a rise in college attainment, many recent graduates are struggling to find roles that match their education level, particularly as AI begins to automate white-collar tasks. This disconnect suggests a deeper misalignment in how we prepare people for the labor market.
  • A surge in bachelor’s degrees hasn’t been matched by a surge in opportunity. The number of people earning college degrees has increased substantially, yet this hasn’t translated into better job placement or upward mobility for many graduates, hinting at a broken promise in the education-to-employment pipeline.
  • People without degrees are outperforming expectations. Contrary to common narratives, employment rates among non-college-educated workers have improved in recent years. This trend challenges assumptions about where economic opportunity lies and signals a need to rethink credentialism.
  • Career navigation must be reimagined for the AI era. Many young people are navigating a job market that no longer matches traditional pathways. They need updated guidance systems that reflect today’s labor market realities and help them develop adaptable, durable skills.
  • Parents are desperate for modern tools and resources. Many parents feel unprepared to help their children thrive in today’s complex world. They are seeking updated, accessible resources that reflect current realities and equip them to support their kids in meaningful, future-ready ways.
  • A place-based, community-driven parenting curriculum could be transformative. There’s an opportunity to create parenting supports that are deeply rooted in local needs, shaped by cross-sector collaboration, and tailored to the real conditions families face on the ground.
  • Young people need proximity to possibility. Exposure to mentorship, networks, and real examples of success is critical. Youth are better able to envision and pursue meaningful futures when they can see what’s possible through trusted relationships and intergenerational support.
  • Today’s guidance systems are woefully outdated. School counselors and other advisors are often overwhelmed, under-resourced, or operating from outdated assumptions. Young people need future-facing guidance tools that reflect the fast-changing world of work.
  • AI could play a role in personalizing and scaling guidance. With the right design and data, AI has the potential to provide tailored, real-time guidance that meets each learner where they are — offering suggestions, pathways, and encouragement in a scalable way.
  • The current job market is brutal for Gen Z. Some young people are submitting hundreds of AI-generated cover letters with little success, reflecting both the hyper-competitive nature of today’s labor market and a growing sense of disillusionment about career readiness. Simultaneously, AI-laden recruiting software imposes strict parameters on even the most qualified of candidates, filtering them out of the hiring pipeline unnecessarily.
  • Employers are caught in a Catch-22 of their own making: they demand experience yet offer few pathways to get it. Many employers list “prior experience” as a prerequisite for entry-level roles, even as they shrink internship programs, reduce on-the-job training, and fail to create clear earn-and-learn pathways. This paradox disproportionately affects young people — especially those without access to well-networked mentors or unpaid work experience—who find themselves locked out of opportunity before they’ve even begun. The result is a self-perpetuating loop: a talent pool deemed “unprepared” not because of lack of potential, but because the system never gave them a chance to prove it.
  • We need more bilingual talent fluent in both tech and impact. There’s a critical shortage of people who understand both advanced AI systems and the complex realities of the social sector. Building cross-functional, technically capable teams will be essential to making AI work for good.
  • The most effective nonprofits will couple tech with deep human expertise. Organizations that integrate AI into their strategy while staying grounded in pedagogy, community trust, and lived experience will be best positioned to deliver meaningful outcomes.
  • We need faster feedback loops between experience and evidence. Too often, it takes years to understand whether a policy or program has worked. Investing in data infrastructure and short-term proxies for long-term outcomes will help systems learn and improve more quickly.
  • A better future requires both urgency and imagination. It’s not enough to simply react to AI; leaders must act urgently to reshape the system — and also imagine radically different, more inclusive possibilities. Otherwise, we risk reinforcing the same inequities under new technological wrappers.

Questions we’re still asking:

1. How can we build career navigation systems that truly reflect today’s labor market realities?

There’s a clear consensus that existing guidance systems (from high school counselors to college pathways) are outdated and disconnected from the fast-moving job market. But what would a truly modernized system look like? How can it be both data-informed and deeply human, scalable and personalized, responsive to local labor conditions but aligned with broader trends like AI disruption?

2. What’s the right role for AI in supporting young people’s transitions into adulthood?

AI came up repeatedly as both a tool of promise and a source of unease. How do we ensure it amplifies human insight rather than replacing it? Can it truly offer equitable guidance without deep community input in its design? And how do we build trust in AI tools among young people who already feel the system is stacked against them?

3. How do we rebalance the perceived value of college versus non-college pathways?

The traditional “college or bust” mindset is breaking down, but what comes next is still murky. What should replace the old hierarchy of credentials? How do we create a labor market and cultural narrative that values skilled trades, apprenticeships, and alternative pathways just as much as a bachelor’s degree?

4. What does it look like to design truly place-based solutions in a national context?

Participants voiced strong belief in localized, community-rooted solutions. But questions remain: How do we balance the nuance of place with the efficiency of national models? Can we scale what’s working locally without flattening what makes it powerful? And what infrastructure is needed to make place-based innovation replicable and sustainable?

5. How do we support young people who are “doing everything right” but still stuck?

A deeply felt tension emerged around the young people who are working hard, following guidance, and still not progressing. Why aren’t their efforts yielding returns? Is it a failure of systems, expectations, or opportunity design? What does justice look like for this group — and what kinds of interventions (navigational, relational, structural) will actually help them move forward?

6. How do we square the inherent tension between the power of industry and the power of the American education system?

Calling on employers and educators to rectify a broken system exposes an uncomfortable truth — businesses have the capital; educators do not. While both employers and the education system will need to make changes in order to better serve young job seekers, the pace of change is unlikely to be equal.


NationSwell’s Workforce Innovation Collaborative:

As SFF’s research reveals, the workforce landscape is shifting rapidly — shaped by AI, automation, shifting demographics, and economic uncertainty. The labor market in the next decade will face urgent challenges and opportunities across every sector and industry. Impact leaders need a trusted space to align on what’s next.

Launching in Fall 2025, NationSwell’s Workforce Innovation Collaborative is where cross-sector leaders come together to explore trends, surface bold practices, and co-design scalable solutions. Collaborative members join a peer-driven learning and action journey — building cross-sector relationships, surfacing bold solutions, and advancing shared impact through strategy, storytelling, and collective action. 

Join the collaborative to access curated research, insights, and expert-led workshops that will help you to stay ahead of workforce trends and technologies. Alongside a trusted cohort of senior leaders across sectors, participants will move from insight to action through targeted workstreams and strategic planning designed to unlock aligned, real-world progress. 

If you are interested in learning more, please get in touch.