Ask the Experts: The Pay Gap Explained

You’ve probably heard (or read) the most commonly cited stat about the wage gap: On average, women make 77 cents for every dollar a man earns — a ratio that hasn’t shifted since 2002. President Barack Obama wasn’t shy about using this figure (again) in a speech on April 8, otherwise known as National Equal Pay Day (the date marks how far into the following year women must work to earn what men earned in the previous year), when he issued two measures aimed at narrowing the gap among workers contracted by the federal government, noting that “it’s an embarrassment” that women with the same education in the same field earn less than men.

But the 77-cent figure doesn’t paint a complete picture of the wage gap, a fact that has been hashed out countless times in political speeches and the media. It derives from a simple calculation of U.S. Census Bureau data — the difference between women’s median salaries and those of men. It doesn’t take into account other variables that affect wages, like level of education, amount of work experience, or the fact that women are more likely than men to take jobs with lower salaries but more flex time — to better  accommodate child-rearing. Depending on how you add it up, the pay gap shrinks (or sometimes grows).

Nevertheless, it doesn’t disappear. Though its actual size may be tricky to pin down, the wage gap is real and signifies a problem that’s much bigger than a single statistic. So, NationSwell convened a panel of experts and asked them to explain the pay gap phenomenon, why it exists and what we can do to fix it. Read on for their thoughts, and then join the conversation by leaving your own ideas in the comments box below.

MORE: The Surprising Key to Closing the Gender Pay Gap

[ph]

[ph]

[ph]

[ph]

[ph]

 

The Surprising Key to Closing the Gender Pay Gap

Dr. Claudia Goldin has a novel solution for the pesky pay gap that persists between men and women, and its benefits could extend well beyond the workplace.
Goldin, a Harvard University economist, hypothesizes that if companies allow employees to work flexible schedules and reward them based on what they actually accomplish — not the hours they toil away in the office — the pay gap between men and women will be whittled away. “The gender gap in pay would be considerably reduced and might even vanish if firms did not have an incentive to disproportionately reward individuals who worked long hours and who worked particular hours,” she writes in a study published in the American Economic Review. To boil it down, according to Goldin’s extensive research, the wage gap isn’t just about gender. It’s about time. Literally.
MORE: One Simple Change Can Help Fix Gender Disparity in Science
The oft-cited statistic about the gender gap is that a woman earns 77 cents for every $1 a man makes. This, of course, doesn’t account for the fact that women often choose lower-paying careers. They also choose to leave the workforce at certain points — many times due to family responsibilities — meaning that they actually have less work experience than men when they get into the latter part of their careers, as Derek Thompson points out in The Atlantic. Still, when you adjust for all those variables, a wage gap of around 9 percent persists. Goldin argues that this isn’t due to straight-out discrimination, but rather, hours worked.
Say a woman and a man are up for a promotion in a corporate job. They have similar qualifications and are equally strong candidates. The only thing that distinguishes them is that the man logged more hours overall because the woman took maternity leave or stayed home with a sick child from time to time. Because of these common scenarios, men often end up getting the promotion simply because they have spent more time working. It’s not exactly fair, but it’s not unfair either, given that they have equal qualifications.
Instead of focusing on the standard 9-to-5 (and then some) workday, which has been the norm for generations, Goldin suggests that companies give their employees more autonomy, allowing them to create schedules that work for their lifestyles. In order to do this, Goldin recommends a pay-per-hour policy, which has been proven to lessen the wage gap between male and female workers. For example, pharmacists are paid in a “linear” fashion, meaning that men and women on the same level get paid the same amount. The more hours they work, the more they get paid, and vice-versa. There’s no cultural penalty for leaving work at a normal hour to get dinner on the table. Coincidentally, this profession boasts some of the lowest gender pay gaps among high-earning occupations.
DON’T MISS: The Bay Area’s New Boom Will Change the Face of Silicon Valley
Of course, it’s not easy to change work culture, especially in corporations where face time is often considered more important than actual productivity. However, flexible work schedules can lead to a range of positive results beyond lessening the gender pay gap. It encourages telecommuting, which cuts down on a company’s operations costs, reduces traffic (a bonus for the environment), and increases productivity. Working too many hours is also proven to increase stress, reduce productivity and decrease overall happiness. Not to mention the fact that many people work extra hours without extra pay. Work flexibility will not only help even out the wage gap, but could also breed happier, healthier employees. Who wouldn’t want that?
ALSO: Can a Children’s Book Persuade Girls That Coding Is Cool?

One Maryland College’s Bold Experiment in Capping Executive Pay

For the people at the top of the pay scale, the concept of salary caps is probably discomforting. But the idea of providing more equal wages for all employees is being debated throughout the U.S. and around the world. Last November, Swiss voters rejected an initiative that would have capped executive pay at 12 times that of the lowest-paid employees at their companies. In the U.S., tens of thousands of citizens have signed a petition demanding Congress to cap the salaries of corporate CEOs to 50 times the average worker (let’s not hold our breath on that one). And now, students and faculty members at St. Mary’s College in Maryland have proposed a plan that would limit the salary of their next president to 10 times that of the lowest-paid employees — the janitors, grounds crew workers, security officers and housekeepers, who make anywhere from $24,500 to $30,000 annually.
MORE: Inside the Movement for Free Community College
St. Mary’s last president — the school currently has an interim president, Ian Newbould, while they hunt for someone permanent — made around $325,000 per year, marking a 1:13 pay ratio, according to the St. Mary’s Wages, the St. Mary’s Way website. This, of course, represents a more balanced ratio than that of America’s largest businesses, where the average pay ratio is 1:354. But as colleges continue to raise tuition and fees, which have increased 1,120 percent since 1978, and the salaries of university presidents grow, even as the pay of the average worker remains stagnant, students can’t help but wonder what, exactly, they’re paying for. At St. Mary’s, the numbers speak for themselves. According to the campaigners’ research, the salaries of St. Mary’s president and vice presidents have risen approximately 91 percent since 2000. The salaries of the lowest-paid employees have increased only 56 percent over the same time period. The pay of associate and full professors has increased at even lower rates — 29 and 22 percent, respectively. Student tuition, meanwhile, is up 60 percent.
ALSO: This Congresswoman Has a Plan to Protect College Students from Crippling Debt
Under St. Mary’s proposal, which would need approval from the board of trustees in order to be implemented, the president’s pay would be cut to about $300,000 annually. Obviously, that’s no small amount of money. The hope is that the pay cap will stop the rapid growth of executive pay and save the university money, which could in turn keep tuition costs down. Beyond that, the campaigners hope a pay cap will encourage the school’s top administrator to consider the workers at the bottom of the totem pole, who anonymously told campaigners that they often struggle to make ends meet. “I have to work overtime every week, had to let some of my bills go [unpaid] like my house phone, cable, and cut back on my heating, food, water, and my gas bill,” one worker wrote. “Sometimes I need to borrow money from friends, family, and by the time I get my pay check, I’m broke again.”
Critics of the salary cap say it will prevent the college from attracting talented higher education executives. They also say that providing lower-income workers with higher pay will raise costs, force job cuts and stifle in-house hiring. But the campaigners say that high pay is no guarantee for excellence, and maintain that the cap will attract candidates who are better fits for the university’s mission. “We’re deeply attached to our public identity,” Sandy Ganzell, math and computer professor at St. Mary’s and one of the campaigners, told The Huffington Post. “There’s no such thing as the best college president out there; there’s the best president for St. Mary’s … and that’s the person who believes in our mission.”
DON’T MISS: The Minerva Project: An Online College to Rival the Ivy League

What Do You Call a Dedicated Teacher at a Community College?

At Wake Tech in Raleigh, N.C., nearly 200 instructors were recently given a much-deserved new title: professor. As the News Observer reports, it’s unusual for community colleges anywhere in the country to award such ranks, even if these faculty members have worked for decades and are just as respected as their peers at universities.
Not only does the new title give recognition to these hardworking faculty members, it incentivizes other instructors to continue working at the school. Administrators only considered “professor” promotions if faculty members had worked for more than seven years and submitted an essay about the breadth of their scholarly work, in and out of the classroom. According to the News Observer, about 85 percent of 258 applicants were given new titles.
MORE: This Could Be the Greatest Business School Hack Ever
Besides a new rank, these professors also got a raise of up to 6 percent. It’s a start to closing a striking pay gap in academia; the average salary of full time faculty members is $82,556 while the average salary at Wake Tech for an instructor is $46,000, Inside Higher Ed reports.
But it’s not just about the bigger paychecks. After he was given his new professor title, John Clevenger, a 25-year electronics teacher said, “We all teach because we love the job. I honestly see it as an honor to be recognized by my peers.”