The Foreign Policy Expert Who’s Helping Americans Better Understand the Muslim World

In August 2013, scholar and author Shadi Hamid wrapped up the research he was doing in Egypt and left the country. Two days later, security forces slaughtered at least 800 protesters who supported the first democratically elected Islamist president, Mohamed Morsi, who had just been ousted in a military coup. To Hamid, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution’s Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World, the event marked an end to the promise of the Arab Spring. Where democracies once seemed possible in Egypt, Syria, Libya and elsewhere, civil wars dragged on, religious factions stifled dissent or lost power in coups, and extremist groups like the Islamic State filled power vacuums. The question he ponders now is how to decipher what role religion plays today in Middle Eastern politics. NationSwell spoke to Hamid from his home in Washington, D.C.
What’s the best advice you have ever been given on leadership?
Believing in something is very important. That sounds banal, in the sense that it should go without saying. But as someone who lives in Washington, one thing that bothers me about this town is when people lose sight of why they do what they do. Sometimes the passion is lacking, and people get stuck in a routine. You don’t want to ever lose sense of why you set out to do something.
Speaking for myself, I want to do what I can to improve US policy toward the Middle East. I have strong beliefs about America’s role in the world. We, as Americans, have a moral responsibility to try to live up to our own ideals when it comes to our foreign policy. Ultimately, we need to be inspired by something — whatever that happens to be — and not lose sight of that as we get stuck in endless careerism.
What’s the one book that you’d recommend to someone who wants to better understand the Arab world today?
Misquoting Mohammad” by Jonathan Brown. It covers politics, history and theology, so it provides a good overview of how Islam, as a religion, has evolved over time and interacted with different political environments. A big focus of the book is on Islam’s encounter with modernity, and it helps challenge a lot of the Western-centric assumptions about the role of religion in public life.
What developments in the Middle East are you most excited about right now?
To be honest, very little. Watching Tunisia’s evolution gives me some optimism, though excitement is probably not the right word. Here is a country where Islamists and secularists might hate each other, but they’ve agreed to hate each other within the democratic process. The goal is not to get the other person to agree with you and come to your side; it’s to accept and respect those differences peacefully. Tunisia is an example of what that might look like in practice.
One other thing that gave me a brief jolt of optimism was the images coming from Turkey during the failed coup attempt in July. Yes, [President Recep Tayyip] Erdogan has become increasingly authoritarian in cracking down on his opponents, but in that moment — and that moment will matter for the foreseeable future — ordinary Turks took to the street to oppose a military coup. You had people who were unarmed facing off against tanks, and usually in the Middle East, people-power doesn’t work. This was one of the only times in recent years where the tanks didn’t win out. That, to me, was a powerful moment to watch.
Given the negative outlook, where do you find the motivation to continue your research?
What keeps it interesting for me is that I like to challenge myself in my own research. In my new book, “Islamic Exceptionalism: How the Struggle Over Islam Is Reshaping the World,” it started out as one thing and ended up as something else, because through the process of research and writing, I found my own ideas evolving and even changing in ways that I was slightly uncomfortable with. Some of them are controversial, not just to other people, but also to me. But as a researcher, you have to be faithful to your findings, even if you’re not super-happy with them. But that’s also exciting, because it feels like I haven’t been stationary in my own work and that I’ve evolved based on what I’ve seen in the region and spending time in the field. I hope that in the coming years, my views will continue to evolve, and I’ll be challenged by world events that will force me and others to reassess opinions.
What do you wish someone had told you when you started this job?
I wish someone told me about taking work-life balance more seriously. Really, for the past 10 years, I’ve constantly had an overarching, almost all-consuming project to worry about. First was my Ph.D. dissertation, then it was my first book, then it was my second book. There wasn’t much of a gap between any of them. That’s 10 years where, in the back of my mind, I’ve been like, “I’ve gotta be working on this.” I wish, in retrospect, I had spent more time thinking about my priorities, finding that balance and having more perspective about what’s ultimately important. You worry sometimes that your work almost becomes a vehicle for contentment. Yes, that’s a part of what makes us happy, but when it’s so intertwined with your identity it’s not always super-healthy.
What does a perfect day look like to you?
I love exploring new beaches. So being in front of the water, having a really good book, taking a nap and not worrying about work. Presumably, I wouldn’t be there all by myself, but with friends. And if I’m in D.C., I really enjoy binge-watching my favorite TV shows for, like, five hours straight and totally diving into a character-driven series.
What accomplishment are you most proud of?
My new book is probably what I’m most proud of, because in some ways, it’s more personal. Every day, I grappled with the ideas, and I wasn’t really sure what the end product was going to be. There was a lot of uncertainty: Would I be able to do this, given that the vision in the beginning wasn’t as clear? But there came a point where I was able to let it go and to be happy with it. It may not be perfect, but in this moment, it’s perfect for me and I’m ready to have other people read it and, hopefully, enjoy it.

America Claims to be the Land of Opportunity. But Do The Numbers Support that Moniker?

It seems that whenever the federal government releases a new statistical report providing insight into the state of our country, the numbers feel negative. Some indicate the number of people living in poverty while others detail the federal deficit.
However, one man is looking to change this, or at least supplement it, with the addition of so-called “social mobility” statistics.  With this measure, the U.S. would be able to quantify something it has always claimed to be the land of: opportunity.
And that’s exactly what Richard Reeves want to call this government department: the Office of Opportunity. Reeves is a fellow in economic studies and the policy director for the Center on Children and Families at the Brookings Institution.
How would social mobility be measured? Well, the government has a few options available. One idea is to analyze the proportion of children born in lower quintiles of the income ladder who move to the top two. Another option is to look at high school graduation rates of students with a GPA of 2.5 and higher. Or the government could use the number of four-year olds in preschool, the number of 25- to 49-year olds who work or the number of births within marriages.
All of these numbers would provide insight into the social mobility stats of the country. The government could also look to the U.K. and New Zealand for help in crafting it. These two countries already have similar programs established, such as the U.K., which uses 17 indicators to track long-term mobility.
Ultimately, Reeves hopes to create a dashboard of indicators that can be analyzed yearly in an annual report. This data, in turn, would help the government create informed polices.
The Office of Opportunity would function similarly to the Congressional Budget Office. It would be small and independent, making it a reliable and viable office that both Republicans and Democrats can trust. Reeves estimates that it would cost about $10 million a year to operate.
While, the federal government has yet to display serious interest in its creation, some cities and states, like Colorado, are considering the idea. And that may be the best thing — start local and build up.
According to Reeves, all that is left is for the government to decide if it is worth it.
“Adopting an official mobility measure is unlikely to require vast new data collection — though some investments would need to be made,” he writes in his Brookings proposal. “It’s more of a question of deciding mobility is worth measuring and promoting.”
So, what do you think – is it?
MORE: Minnesota’s Bold Move to Hire More Employees with Disabilities

Cities or Suburbs: Which Area is Seeing a Population Boom?

Close your eyes and picture idyllic tree-lined streets in a cheery suburban neighborhood. If you open your eyes, however, you might still see that image — only there might be a lot of “for sale” signs posted in front yards or dark houses due to vacancy.
That’s because cities are now seeing a population influx. According to census analysis by William Frey of the Brookings Institution, this could be the decade of big-city growth.
Analyzing data from 2010-2013, Frey was able to figure out that cities themselves — not just their metropolitan areas — grew at a measurably faster rate than suburbs, with “primary cities” (those with a population over 1 million) growing 1.13 percent from 2011 to 2012. At the same time, suburban areas grew at only .95 percent.
While the difference (and growth rate itself) may seem minimal, it reflects more significant changes that are happening in a select number of cities such as New Orleans; Washington, D.C.; San Jose, California; Austin, Texas; Raleigh-Cary, North Carolina; Denver; and Seattle. All those cities have even faster growth rates even faster than the national average!
Although there are a variety of reasons that people may be migrating back to cities, one that we’ve mentioned before is the rise of the innovation district – urban areas that are easily accessible and combine a variety of organizations and people advancing ideas and promoting ingenuity. These areas attract not only jobs, but because of their cosmopolitan and integrated feel, residents too.
Another specific driver of growth could be the new transportation initiative in Minneapolis-St. Paul, another booming city, according to City Lab.
So, does this mean the demise of white picket fences and two-car garages? Hardly. As the study points out, the suburbs are continuing to grow, albeit at a slower pace. But with growth, comes innovation — giving cities the upper hand.

D.C., New York City and Boston Named Tops for Foot Traffic

Go on, step outside and take a stroll not through the woods, but through an urban area instead.
LOCUS, a national group of real estate developers and investors who work towards creating more sustainable and walker-friendly urban areas, just released a report, Foot Traffic Ahead: Ranking Walkable Urbanism in America’s Largest Metros,  on the most walkable urban areas in America.
Topping the list? Washington D.C., New York City and Boston.
LOCUS, which works in partnership with Smart Growth America (a non-profit that focuses on developing and sustaining great urban neighborhoods), held its LOCUS Leadership Summit on June 17-18 in Washington D.C. The gathering was a forum for real estate developers, investors, members of Congress and others to brainstorm ideas on design, planning, finance, and management.
The highlight of the event, however, was the release of the rankings of the 30 largest metropolitan areas with the most walkable urban areas. The study was conducted by the Responsible Real Estate Developers and Investors in coordination with George Washington University’s Center for Real Estate and Urban Analysis. This year’s rankings updated those from a 2007 report from the Brookings Institution’s Metropolitan Policy Program.
The study used office and retail space and walkability within the seven categories of the metro area — downtown, downtown adjacent, urban commercial, urban university suburban town center, redeveloped drivable suburban and green or brown field — to determine the rankings.
Phoenix and Orlando fell to the bottom of the list. However, there is hope for them to improve as the study not just looked at each city’s walkability today, but also predicted their future foot-friendliness. In that set of rankings, Boston moved to the number-one spot, and Orlando jumped to number 18.
Further findings suggest a strong correlation between education and walkability as the higher education levels were also found in the top ranking cities. Top ranking cities also had 38 percent higher GDP per capita, and office rent in urban areas was 74 percent higher per square feet than drivable suburban offices.
So while urban areas face lots of difficulties, this report makes it sound like they have a lot going for them as well.
To view the full report, click here.
MORE: Infrastructure: America’s Investment for the Future

Millennials: Changing The Look and Feel of the Workforce

Although the world did not end at the start of the new century, the new generation that emerged with it is giving the world a little shake.
Only 14 years in and their impact is already being felt with changes in politics and consumerism. This generation played a large role in electing the first black president and redefined how music is bought and sold. With the millennials becoming 75 percent of the workforce by 2025, America is only just beginning to hear their voice and needs to be prepared to adjust to their differing lifestyle.
The Brookings Institution recently conducted a study exploring the preferences and behaviors of the millennials. Their results showed that the business world will receive a shake up when these workers enter the workforce.
Already, their tastes indicate a swerve from the established norms, and fast food will be one of the first industries to feel this transition. For the past 60 years, Burger King and McDonalds maintained a stronghold over the tastes of consumers. But this will change as millennials have opted for different chains, such as Chipotle, Sweetgreen and Panera Bread.
Consumer preferences will further change as millennials will look for more than just a good bargain in their shopping. Social causes and innovation are important as well, making millennials more inclined to shop at places that are also involved in such activities.
Finances will be impacted due to this generation’s general distrust of big banks. When asked which banks with whom they would least like to do business, many of the biggest financial institutions in the country were named — including Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup, which is not a positive sign for the banking world.
Similar to where they will shop, millennials will prefer to work for a company that will have an impact on the world. At the top of the list was St. Jude’s Children Research Hospital, followed by the State Department at number 12, the NSA at number 17, the FBI, the CIA, Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon.
What can and should businesses learn from this study? First, they need to develop a more social and worldly view with regards to how they conduct business. (The shoe company TOMS exemplifies this in their policy of donating one pair of shoes to a child in need for every shoe purchased.) Second, companies will need to adapt their style of employee motivation. The age of big profits as a motivator is not as prevalent and is being replaced by social impact. More personal and individual contact is important as well, shown through PricewaterhouseCoopers’ decision to replace annual performance reviews with more frequent feedback.
Social impact and a personal touch are the big indicators of this new generation. America may have 11 more years before the millennials completely dominate the workforce, but it’s in the country’s best interest to start paving the way for their integration now.
MORE: Why Millennials Are Taking Big Pay Cuts to Work at Small Companies

Ask the Experts: 7 Ways to Improve K-12 Public Education

The United States bests almost every country in the world in many areas, but when it comes to educational achievement, American students are just plain mediocre. According to the most recent (2012) results of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) — a test of critical thinking administered every three years to about half a million 15-year-olds around the globe — U.S. students are lagging behind those in many other countries, including China, Finland and Korea, in math, reading and science. Compared with other developed nations, the U.S. performs average or below. Worse, among the 34 countries surveyed, the U.S. school system ranked fifth in spending per student, at $115,000. That’s a hefty chunk of change for so-so results.

PISA scores aren’t the only measure of an educational system, but most experts agree that American schools are in need of a major overhaul. The question is: What kinds of reforms will result in lasting, meaningful changes?

As part of NationSwell’s Ask the Expert series, we asked our panel to share their ideas on how best to improve K-12 public education. Read on for their thoughts, and then join the conversation by leaving your own ideas in the comments box.

MORE: The Radical School Reform That Just Might Work
[ph]
[ph]
[ph]
[ph]
[ph]
[ph]
[ph]
 
[ph]